Our work.
Our voice.
Our future.

Organizing can create a structured, collective voice on compensation, benefits, safety, scheduling, professional standards, and fairness. Representation does not automatically produce a specific contract or outcome: it creates a process through which employees can negotiate shared priorities.

Colleagues can disagree on what matters most. A useful beginning is asking, “What would you want a stronger voice in?” instead of assuming everyone has the same concerns.

Many airline and qualifying air-carrier employees organize under the Railway Labor Act (RLA). Section 2, Third and Fourth protects employees' choice of representatives from carrier interference, influence, and coercion. Representation questions are administered by the National Mediation Board (NMB), rather than the NLRB. Whether a particular employer and group fall within RLA jurisdiction is determined by law and facts, not just by a job title.

The NLRA and NLRB are relevant for understanding labor rights in many other private-sector settings, but their workplace-solicitation case law should not simply be copied into an RLA analysis.

Start with an invitation, not a pitch: “Have you thought about what a collective voice could improve?” Listen to their priorities, share official resources, and offer to connect them to an organizer. Be accurate about uncertainties and avoid promising wages, elections, or contract terms.

Participation is voluntary. A colleague who is curious may want time, written information, or a private conversation. There is no need to push for a decision on the spot.

Off-duty conversations using personal devices and non-employer channels are generally the lowest-risk option. For conversations at work, distinguish a discussion from soliciting signatures or distributing cards. Prefer non-work time and non-work areas for solicitation, follow lawful neutral workplace rules, and never interrupt patient care, flight operations, safety tasks, or colleagues who are working.

RLA Section 2, Fourth protects organizing from carrier interference, but does not grant unrestricted use of work time, employer systems, or operational spaces. Specific policies and their enforcement matter. If access or solicitation is challenged, ask an organizer to review the facts before assuming the restriction is unlawful.

Respect the answer immediately. A simple “No problem. If you ever want official information, here's where to find it” is enough. Do not pressure colleagues to sign, publicly identify supporters or opponents, circulate lists of attendance, or make workplace participation a condition of friendship.

Discuss public campaign information openly when appropriate, but treat private conversations, identities, contact details, and meeting links as sensitive. No organizer can guarantee absolute secrecy if information is disclosed or forwarded.

You can listen calmly, ask for clarification, and avoid speculating about coworkers' opinions or revealing private meetings, card-signing decisions, or participant identities. If a supervisor asks about your own or others' support, threatens consequences, promises benefits for opposing representation, closely monitors participation, or imposes unusual meetings, write down the date, location, exact words, witnesses, and any policy changes, then contact an organizer or TWU.

Not every management statement is unlawful. The NMB examines the totality of circumstances and distinguishes lawful communication from interference, coercion, and material misrepresentation. Case-specific advice matters, especially if discipline is threatened.

For the current NMB representation process, authorization cards must be signed and dated in the employee's own handwriting (or witnessed mark), and original cards must be submitted in hard copy. That is the NMB's current rule and administrative process, not merely a preference chosen by organizers or TWU. The organizing team can explain how cards are distributed and returned securely.

A request for a card is not a signed authorization and does not cast a ballot. We recognize that the paper requirement is inconvenient, and it could change if the NMB changes its rules or procedures.

You can ask privately, anonymously, or request a discussion with an organizer. If you believe you are facing retaliation or coercion, retain your own contemporaneous notes but do not upload patient information, confidential company records, or proprietary documents. Seek individualized guidance about applicable reporting and legal options.

The RLA prohibits carrier interference with employees' selection of representatives. The NMB has considered surveillance, interrogation, threats, discipline, and changes in benefits when assessing election interference. The outcome depends on the facts and stage of the representation proceeding.